IAS 12CoreHospitality & F&B

Deferred tax on temporary differences

IAS 12 · Income Taxes

Applies to: All business models

In plain words

Start-up losses at new outlets, IFRS 16 right-of-use assets and provisions all create gaps between accounting and tax amounts, called temporary differences. Under IAS 12 these produce deferred tax liabilities or assets. A deferred tax asset on losses is recognised only to the extent a credible forecast shows future taxable profit is probable. In a mixed ownership entity, only the income-tax portion is in scope; Zakat is generally treated as outside IAS 12.

Why it matters

Deferred tax gets misstated in almost every early-stage hospitality group because start-up losses, IFRS 16 right-of-use assets, and provisions create temporary differences that are easy to spot but easy to mismeasure; overstating a deferred tax asset on unproven new-outlet losses inflates net assets and can mislead lenders and shareholders on true distributable profit.

Diagnostic questions

Do accounting and tax depreciation rates differ for PP&E, leasehold improvements, or right-of-use assets, creating temporary differences that need a deferred tax entry? Are provisions not yet deductible for tax (onerous leases, ECL, EOSB) or accelerated tax depreciation creating deferred tax assets/liabilities that have actually been recognized? Is it probable that sufficient future taxable profit will be available to utilize tax losses or unused tax credits generated by new-outlet start-up losses, and has that assessment been documented (including interaction with zakat where applicable)?

Recognition

  1. Compare the tax base and accounting carrying amount of every material asset/liability (PP&E, ROU assets/lease liabilities, provisions, ECL allowances, unused tax losses) to identify taxable and deductible temporary differences.
  2. Classify each difference: taxable temporary difference -> recognize a deferred tax liability in full (subject to limited exceptions); deductible temporary difference or unused tax loss -> recognize a deferred tax asset only to the extent recognition criteria in step 3 are met.
  3. For deductible differences/tax losses, assess whether it is probable that sufficient future taxable profit will be available, using a credible budget/forecast (typically 3-5 years), before recognizing any deferred tax asset; document the forecast and key assumptions (occupancy/covers ramp-up, pricing).
  4. Determine whether the entity is subject to income tax, Zakat, or a mixed regime based on GCC/foreign ownership percentages; apply IAS 12 deferred tax only to the income-tax-attributable portion, and treat the Zakat-attributable portion under local Zakat rules, not as an IAS 12 deferred tax balance (stay general here as local practice nuances vary).
  5. Reassess unrecognized deferred tax assets at each reporting date; recognize previously unrecognized amounts once profitability becomes probable, and derecognize/reduce recognized DTAs if expectations deteriorate.
  6. Present deferred tax assets and liabilities by category and offset only where a legally enforceable right of set-off exists within the same taxable entity/authority.

Measurement

Measure deferred tax assets and liabilities at the tax rate(s) expected to apply in the period the asset is realized or liability settled, based on tax rates/laws enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date (in KSA, the applicable income tax rate for the foreign/mixed-ownership portion). Deferred tax is not discounted. Reassess the recoverability of deferred tax assets at each reporting date (not just initial recognition) and remeasure using updated forecasts and any change in enacted rates; deferred tax on items recognized in OCI or equity (e.g., some IFRS 16 transition adjustments) is itself recognized in OCI or equity, not P&L.

Presentation & disclosure

Disclose: deferred tax assets/liabilities by major category of temporary difference; amount and expiry (if any) of unrecognized deductible temporary differences/tax losses; a reconciliation of tax expense to accounting profit at the applicable statutory rate; the split/basis for Zakat versus income tax treatment where ownership is mixed; movement in net deferred tax balance during the period; deferred tax related to items recognized in OCI presented separately from P&L-related deferred tax.

Common mistakes

  1. Recognizing a deferred tax asset on new-outlet start-up losses based on optimistic budgets rather than a credible, evidenced forecast.
  2. Applying IAS 12 deferred tax mechanics to the Zakat-attributable portion of a mixed-ownership entity instead of accounting for Zakat as a separate provision under local rules.
  3. Forgetting the deferred tax effect of IFRS 16 right-of-use assets and lease liabilities (these create their own temporary differences even though they often net to a small amount).
  4. Not reassessing previously unrecognized deferred tax assets each period as new outlets become profitable.
  5. Discounting deferred tax balances, which IAS 12 does not permit.

Simple example

A KSA restaurant group's new branch (mixed GCC/foreign ownership, subject to income tax on the foreign-owned share) incurs a SAR 500,000 tax loss in year 1, attributable at 40% to the income-tax-paying portion (SAR 200,000) at a 20% statutory rate. Management's credible 3-year forecast supports utilization of only 75% of this loss against future taxable profit; the balance is not recognized.
Deferred tax asset = SAR 200,000 x 20% x 75% = SAR 30,000.
Journal entry at year-end:
Dr Deferred tax asset 30,000
   Cr Deferred tax income (P&L) 30,000
In year 2, if a further 15% of the loss becomes probable of utilization following an improved forecast (additional recognizable base SAR 30,000 x 20% = 6,000):
Dr Deferred tax asset 6,000
   Cr Deferred tax income (P&L) 6,000
The Zakat-attributable 60% (SAR 300,000 of the loss) is not run through IAS 12 deferred tax; it is addressed under the entity's Zakat computation and provisioning, not as a deferred tax asset.

Professional judgment

The central judgment is what counts as 'probable' future taxable profit for a new outlet with no operating history: management must weigh forecast credibility (track record of similar outlets, occupancy/covers ramp-up curves, committed contracts) against optimism bias, and auditors typically expect a sensitivity-tested budget rather than a single-point forecast. A second genuine grey area is apportioning temporary differences and losses between the Zakat-attributable and income-tax-attributable portions of a mixed-ownership entity, since the practical mechanics can depend on how the entity's Zakat/tax registration and ownership percentages are structured and administered locally -- this should be confirmed with tax/Zakat advisors rather than assumed.

Source basis

IAS 12 · Income Taxes

Paragraph references

IAS 12.15IAS 12.24IAS 12.34IAS 12.47

Verified against the official standard texts used in the IFRS Expert skill.

IAS 12 Income Taxes
Issued: 1996 (revised) · Effective: 1 January 1998

Related issues

Educational and navigation content only. Not professional advice. Does not reproduce official IFRS/IAS text. Consult the authoritative standards and qualified professionals; professional judgment may still be required.