In plain words
Sales staff earn commissions when they close deals. Under IFRS 15, should a commission be expensed immediately or recorded as an asset? Costs that would not exist without winning the contract are capitalised and amortised over the period of benefit, which may include expected renewals. Base salaries are not incremental and are expensed. A practical expedient allows expensing when the amortisation period is one year or less.
Why it matters
Incremental sales commissions that would not have been paid without winning the contract must be capitalized and amortized over the period of benefit rather than expensed on payment, so expensing them immediately understates current profitability right when a company is scaling its sales force, and using the wrong amortization period (initial term versus full expected customer life) materially changes the expense trajectory reported to investors.
Diagnostic questions
Are the commissions incremental to obtaining the contract, meaning they would not have been paid had the deal not closed? Are renewal commissions commensurate with (broadly proportionate to) initial commissions, which determines whether amortization stops at the initial term or extends over expected customer life? Is the amortization period refreshed periodically using actual cohort churn data rather than a static assumption set at inception? Does the practical expedient to expense commissions immediately apply because the resulting amortization period would be one year or less?
Recognition
- Identify costs that are incremental to obtaining the contract, meaning they would not have been incurred if the contract had not been won (e.g., a sales commission tied to closing the deal), excluding costs that would be incurred regardless (e.g., base salaries).
- Apply the practical expedient to expense the cost immediately if the resulting amortization period would be one year or less.
- Where the expedient does not apply, capitalize the incremental cost as a contract cost asset.
- Determine the amortization period as the period over which the related goods or services are transferred, extending to expected renewals if renewal commissions are not commensurate with the commission paid on the original sale (implying the original commission effectively pays for the renewal period too).
- Amortize on a systematic basis consistent with the pattern of transfer of the related goods or services (typically straight-line, matching the revenue pattern).
- Test the asset for impairment if the carrying amount exceeds the remaining expected consideration less remaining costs to provide the service.
Measurement
Measure the capitalized cost at the actual incremental amount paid or payable (e.g., the commission amount, not a gross-up including non-incremental compensation). Amortize on a systematic basis over the determined period, refreshing the expected customer life estimate periodically using actual cohort renewal and churn data, and adjusting the remaining amortization period prospectively when the estimate changes materially rather than restating amounts already amortized.
Presentation & disclosure
Disclose: (1) the closing balance of capitalized contract cost assets and the amortization expense for the period; (2) the method of amortization and the judgment on the amortization period, including how expected renewals were factored in; (3) whether the one-year practical expedient was applied and to what population of costs; (4) any impairment losses recognized on contract cost assets.
Common mistakes
- Expensing all sales commissions immediately regardless of amortization period length
- amortizing over the initial contract term (e.g., one year) when churn data clearly shows customers renew for several years and renewal commissions are much lower, understating the true amortization period
- capitalizing costs that are not truly incremental (e.g., a portion of a salesperson'
- s base salary)
- failing to apply the one-year practical expedient consistently, creating unnecessary tracking overhead for immaterial amounts
- not testing for impairment when a customer'
- s expected future consideration has declined significantly (e.g., a downgrade).
Simple example
A sales rep earns a SAR 24,000 commission (10% of a SAR 240,000 one-year contract) that would not have been paid without winning the deal; renewal commissions are nominal (not commensurate), and cohort data shows an average 4-year customer life, so the commission is capitalized and amortized over 4 years, not the 1-year initial term. Journal entry on paying the commission: Dr Contract cost asset (capitalized commission) 24,000 Cr Cash / Accrued commission payable 24,000 Annual amortization (SAR 24,000 / 4 years = SAR 6,000 per year): Dr Amortization of contract costs (P&L) 6,000 Cr Contract cost asset (capitalized commission) 6,000 At the end of year 1, the remaining asset balance is SAR 18,000, correctly matching the commission expense to the 4-year period over which the customer relationship is expected to generate revenue.
Professional judgment
Estimating expected customer life is the central and most consequential judgment, and it should be grounded in the entity's own historical cohort retention and churn data (refreshed at least annually) rather than an industry rule of thumb, since amortization period materially affects the timing of expense recognition during a high-growth phase. The commensurate-renewal-commission test is equally judgmental: a renewal commission that is only slightly lower than the original may still be commensurate, while one that is trivial in comparison indicates the original commission is effectively paying for the full expected relationship, not just the initial term.
Source basis
IFRS 15 · Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Paragraph references
Verified against the official standard texts used in the IFRS Expert skill.
Related issues
Educational and navigation content only. Not professional advice. Does not reproduce official IFRS/IAS text. Consult the authoritative standards and qualified professionals; professional judgment may still be required.
